Analysis
The Forever Wars: How 60 Words Changed Everything
On September 14, 2001, Congress passed the Authorization for Use of Military Force. It was 60 words long. It has been used to justify 25 years of global war across 78 countries, costing $8T, killing 940,000 people, and displacing 38 million more. It has never been repealed.
78
Countries with operations
$8T
Total cost
940,000
Directly killed
38M
Displaced
The Authorization for Use of Military Force (S.J.Res.23) — The Full Text
“That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.”
That's it. Sixty words. No geographic limitation. No sunset clause. No requirement to return to Congress. No definition of who “aided” the attacks or what “harbored” means. No expiration date. This single sentence has authorized more military action than any law in American history.
How 60 Words Became a Blank Check for Global War
The AUMF was drafted in haste and passed in trauma. Three days after the worst attack on American soil since Pearl Harbor, with the ruins of the World Trade Center still smoldering, Congress gave the President unlimited military authority against anyone connected to 9/11. The vote was 98-0 in the Senate and 420-1 in the House.
The key phrase is “he determines.” The President — not Congress, not the courts, not the public — decides who “aided” the 9/11 attacks or “harbored” those who did. This subjective determination has been stretched to cover organizations that didn't exist in 2001, in countries that had nothing to do with 9/11, against enemies that are themselves enemies of al-Qaeda.
The phrase “in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism” is even more elastic. Since terrorism can theoretically come from anywhere, this clause has been used to justify preemptive military action against any group, in any country, that the President labels a potential terrorist threat. The authorization has no meaningful boundary.
The Lone “No” Vote
“However difficult this vote may be, some of us must urge the use of restraint. Our country is in a state of mourning. Some of us must say, let's step back for a moment. Let's just pause for a minute and think through the implications of our actions today so that this does not spiral out of control... As we act, let us not become the evil that we deplore.”
— Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA), September 14, 2001
Lee voted no because she understood what a blank check for war would become. She warned it would “spiral out of control.” She received death threats and needed a bodyguard for months. The Wall Street Journal called it the most irresponsible vote since the last congressman voted against WWII. Twenty-five years and 78 countries later, she has been proven right on every count.
How the AUMF Was Stretched: A Timeline
The AUMF authorized force against those responsible for 9/11. Here's how four presidents expanded it to cover the entire globe:
Al-Qaeda / Taliban — Afghanistan
Original intent of the AUMF
Abu Sayyaf — Philippines
Stretched to cover "affiliate" groups
Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) — Iraq
AQI formed after the invasion
Al-Shabaab — Somalia
Group didn't exist on 9/11
AQAP — Yemen
Regional franchise, different leadership
AQIM — Libya / North Africa
Loose affiliation at best
ISIS — Iraq & Syria
ISIS was an enemy of Al-Qaeda
ISIS affiliates — Libya
Second intervention in Libya
ISIS-linked militants — Niger
Most Americans didn't know troops were in Niger
Al-Shabaab — Kenya
Expanded AFRICOM operations
Houthi rebels — Yemen / Red Sea
No connection to 9/11 whatsoever
Iranian proxies / Iran — Middle East
Developing — no new authorization sought
The ISIS Absurdity
In 2014, the Obama administration used the 2001 AUMF to justify military operations against ISIS in Iraq and Syria. This was legally absurd for a simple reason: ISIS was at war with al-Qaeda. The two organizations had publicly split. ISIS had been expelled from al-Qaeda's network. They were killing each other.
The legal theory was that ISIS had “evolved from” al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), which was itself an affiliate of al-Qaeda — even though AQI didn't exist until after the US invaded Iraq in 2003, two years after 9/11. The chain of logic: the 2001 AUMF authorized force against 9/11 perpetrators → al-Qaeda → AQI (which formed after the invasion the AUMF was used to justify) → ISIS (which split from al-Qaeda and became its enemy).
By this reasoning, the AUMF authorized force against the enemies of the people it was written to target. It had eaten itself. And no one in Congress objected loudly enough to matter.
The Cost Accumulation: Year by Year
Direct war spending under the AUMF, in billions (2025 dollars):
Note: These are direct war appropriations only. Total costs including veteran care, interest on war debt, and homeland security bring the total to $8T.
How “Temporary” Became Permanent
The AUMF was passed as an emergency measure. Three days after 9/11, in a moment of national trauma, Congress acted with understandable urgency. The assumption — stated and unstated — was that this was temporary. The US would find those responsible, bring them to justice, and the authorization would become moot.
But temporary authorizations become permanent through a simple mechanism: political incentives favor continuation. Every president benefits from having unlimited military authority. No president has ever asked Congress to repeal an AUMF. Meanwhile, most members of Congress prefer not to vote on war — a “yes” vote can haunt you if the war goes badly; a “no” vote can end your career if there's a terrorist attack. The path of least resistance is to do nothing, and that's exactly what Congress has done for 25 years.
The forever wars also became self-perpetuating through blowback. US military operations create new enemies. New enemies justify continued operations. Each intervention destabilizes a region, creating power vacuums that extremist groups fill — which then become targets for the next intervention. Afghanistan created al-Qaeda in Iraq. The Iraq War created ISIS. The Libya intervention created a failed state that became a hub for arms trafficking across the Sahel. The cycle never ends because the cycle feeds itself.
The Revolving Door That Sustains Them
500+
Former officials now at defense contractors
$70000000M
Defense lobbying spending (2023)
$285000000M
Campaign contributions from defense sector
Forever wars aren't an accident. They're a business model. Pentagon officials retire to defense contractor boards. Defense contractors fund congressional campaigns. Congress funds the Pentagon. The cycle generates $2.4T in contracts every five years. For the people who profit from war, the AUMF isn't a bug — it's a feature.
Why Americans Don't Notice
The forever wars have been deliberately designed to be invisible to the American public. Three mechanisms make this possible:
1. No Draft
The Vietnam War ended partly because the draft meant every American family had skin in the game. The all-volunteer military ensures that only a tiny fraction of Americans — disproportionately from poor and rural communities — bear the burden of combat. In 2024, less than 1% of Americans served in the military. For the other 99%, war is an abstraction.
2. Deficit Spending
Unlike WWII, which was partly funded by war bonds and tax increases, the post-9/11 wars have been funded entirely through borrowing. There has been no war tax, no rationing, no economic sacrifice asked of the public. The costs are pushed onto future generations through debt. When war costs nothing now, there's no political pressure to stop it.
3. Remote Warfare
Drones, special forces, proxy militias, and cyber operations have replaced large-scale deployments. The US can wage war in a country without most Americans — or most members of Congress — even knowing about it. When four US soldiers were killed in Niger in 2017, most Americans and many senators were stunned to learn that US troops were operating there at all.
📊 What Americans Actually Think
- • 62% of Americans say the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were “not worth fighting” (Pew, 2023)
- • 57% support withdrawing US troops from the Middle East (Chicago Council on Global Affairs, 2023)
- • 73% of veterans say the Iraq War was not worth fighting (Pew, 2023)
- • 65% of Americans say Congress should vote before the President sends troops into combat (YouGov, 2024)
- • 77% support repealing the 2001 AUMF and requiring new authorization (Data for Progress, 2021)
- • Despite this overwhelming opposition, nothing has changed. The wars continue. The AUMF stands.
Every Attempt to Repeal the AUMF Has Failed
Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA)
Failed in committee
Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA)
Amendment rejected 187-234
Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY)
Failed to advance
House Appropriations Committee
Passed committee, then stripped by leadership
House (bipartisan)
Passed House, died in Senate
House 268-161
Passed House, Senate took no action
Senate (bipartisan)
Repealed 2002 Iraq AUMF only — 2001 AUMF untouched
The most revealing moment came in 2017, when the House Appropriations Committee voted to repeal the AUMF. House Republican leadership then stripped the provision from the bill before it reached the floor. The message was clear: even when Congress musters the courage to act, leadership blocks it.
Empires That Collapsed from Overextension
Every great power that maintained a global military presence eventually went bankrupt or collapsed. The pattern is remarkably consistent:
Roman Empire
Military overextension across three continents, economic drain of maintaining frontiers
~500 years of expansion before collapse
Spanish Empire
Endless wars in Netherlands, Americas, Mediterranean bankrupted the treasury
Multiple state bankruptcies (1557, 1575, 1596, 1607)
British Empire
WWI and WWII made colonial maintenance economically impossible
Decolonization 1945-1970
Soviet Union
Afghanistan (1979-89), arms race, global military commitments vs stagnant economy
Collapsed 1991
American Empire?
$8 trillion on War on Terror, $886B/year defense budget, 750 bases in 80 countries
Ongoing
Historian Paul Kennedy documented this pattern in The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: empires expand their military commitments beyond their economic capacity to sustain them. The military spending that once protected trade routes becomes a drain on the treasury. The security establishment becomes a self-perpetuating bureaucracy that demands ever-larger budgets. Eventually, the cost of maintaining the empire exceeds the benefits it provides.
“Of all the enemies to public liberty, war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded, because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes; and armies, and debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few.”
— James Madison, “Political Observations,” 1795
Countries Where the AUMF Has Been Invoked
The US has conducted counterterrorism operations in at least 78 countries:
💡 Did You Know?
- • The 2001 AUMF is only 60 words long — shorter than most text messages. It has authorized more military action than any law in American history.
- • The AUMF has been used against ISIS, even though ISIS was expelled from al-Qaeda and the two groups were actively fighting each other.
- • When 4 US soldiers were killed in Niger in 2017, Senator Lindsey Graham — a member of the Armed Services Committee — said he “didn't know there were 1,000 troops in Niger.”
- • The US has spent $8T on the War on Terror — more than the GDP of every country except the US and China.
- • There are now soldiers deploying to Afghanistan's successor missions who were not yet born when the AUMF was passed.
- • 77% of Americans support requiring new congressional authorization for military operations, but Congress refuses to vote.
- • The War on Terror has displaced 38 million people — more than any conflict since WWII.
The Solution Is Simple
Repeal the 2001 AUMF. Require the President to come to Congress for specific, time-limited, geographically bounded authorization before using military force. Include automatic sunset clauses. Enforce the War Powers Resolution. This is what the Constitution already requires. It's not radical — it's originalist.
The AUMF represents everything the Founders warned against: a blank check for war, unchecked executive power, and a permanent state of conflict that enriches defense contractors while draining the treasury and destroying lives abroad and at home. The War on Terror has cost $8T, killed 940,000 people, displaced 38 million, and made America less safe — not more.
The War on Terror: $8 Trillion Later →
Full analysis of costs and consequences
Wars Without Congress →
How presidents bypassed the Constitution
469 Military Interventions →
The full history of US military force abroad
Your War Tax Receipt →
See how much of your taxes fund war
Iran 2026 →
The latest chapter in the forever wars
Blowback →
How interventions create future enemies