Deep Analysis
War Is a Racket
Who Gets Rich When America Goes to War
“War is a racket. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.” — Major General Smedley Butler, two-time Medal of Honor recipient, 1935. Ninety-one years later, nothing has changed except the scale. The profits are bigger. The wars are longer. The racket is more sophisticated.
AI Overview — Key Data
- 📊 Defense stocks since 9/11: Lockheed +1,236%, General Dynamics +1,450%, Northrop +1,196% — vs S&P 500 +431%
- 📊 Defense CEO pay: $22–30M/year. E-1 Private base pay: $24,072/year. A CEO earns more in one day than a private earns in 2.5 years.
- 📊 672 senior Pentagon officials became defense industry lobbyists or executives (POGO)
- 📊 F-35 program has suppliers in 45 states and 375 congressional districts — by design, making it politically impossible to cancel
- 📊 Post-9/11 contractor deaths: 8,000+ in Iraq and Afghanistan — exceeding military deaths in many years
Defense Stock Performance Since 9/11
September 10, 2001 → March 2026. War is the best investment in America.
General Dynamics (GD)
Abrams tanks, Gulfstream jets, nuclear submarines, IT systems
Lockheed Martin (LMT)
F-35 ($1.7T program), F-22, Hellfire missiles, THAAD, Aegis
Northrop Grumman (NOC)
B-21 Raider, B-2 Spirit, Global Hawk drones, cyber/space systems
Raytheon (RTX) (RTX)
Tomahawk missiles ($2M each), Patriot systems, Stinger, Javelin
Boeing (Defense) (BA)
Apache helicopters, F/A-18, KC-46, JDAM, Harpoon missiles
S&P 500 (benchmark) (SPX)
For comparison — defense stocks massively outperformed the market
Smedley Butler Was Right
In 1935, Major General Smedley Butler — then the most decorated Marine in US history — published War Is a Racket. Butler had fought in nearly every American conflict from the Banana Wars to World War I. He won the Medal of Honor twice. And he came home to tell the truth:
“I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. I helped purify Nicaragua for the International Banking House of Brown Brothers in 1902-1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for the American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Honduras right for the American fruit companies in 1903.”
Ninety-one years later, the racket has only gotten bigger. Butler's “Big Business” has become a trillion-dollar defense industry. His “gangsters for capitalism” have become the most powerful lobbying force in Washington. And the muscle men — the soldiers, sailors, and Marines who do the fighting and dying — still earn less in a year than a defense CEO earns in a day.
CEO Pay vs. the People Who Actually Fight
The disparity between those who profit from war and those who fight it is the most obscene feature of the military-industrial complex. Consider:
Who Gets Paid What
Runs a company whose primary customer is the US taxpayer
$82,740/day
Makes missiles that cost $2M each — paid for by the public
$61,370/day
B-21 bomber program: $203B lifetime cost
$64,384/day
Earned more in one day than an E-1 earns in 2.5 years
$62,466/day
The person actually risking their life in Iran right now
$65.94/day
Leading a squad in combat — earns less in a year than a CEO earns in a day
$104.27/day
Permanently disabled from war — earns 0.14% of a defense CEO salary
$115.17/day
The Lockheed Martin CEO earns 1,254x what an E-1 Private earns. The Private is in Iran. The CEO is in Bethesda, Maryland.
The Revolving Door: From Pentagon to Profit
According to the Project on Government Oversight (POGO), 672 senior Pentagon officials left government service and became lobbyists, board members, executives, or consultants for defense contractors between 2008 and 2023. The revolving door between the Pentagon and the defense industry is not a metaphor — it is a career path.
The pattern is consistent: serve in government, make decisions that benefit certain contractors, leave government, and join those contractors at compensation packages that dwarf government salaries. The implicit bargain is never spoken but always understood.
The Revolving Door
Dick Cheney
Secretary of Defense (1989–1993) → VP (2001–2009)
Halliburton CEO (1995–2000)
Halliburton received $39.5 billion in Iraq contracts. Cheney retained stock options and deferred compensation while VP. KBR (Halliburton subsidiary) provided troop support, logistics, and construction. Found to have overcharged the government by hundreds of millions.
Lloyd Austin
Secretary of Defense (2021–2025)
Raytheon board member ($1.4M/year)
Sat on Raytheon's board before becoming SecDef. Raytheon makes Tomahawk missiles — the primary weapon used in Operation Epic Fury and Midnight Hammer. Recused from Raytheon-specific decisions but oversaw the broader defense strategy that enriched all contractors.
Mark Esper
Secretary of Defense (2019–2020)
Raytheon VP for Government Relations
Raytheon's top lobbyist became the person deciding which weapons to buy. No conflict of interest review prevented this.
James Mattis
Secretary of Defense (2017–2019)
General Dynamics board member
Sat on the board of General Dynamics — maker of the Abrams tank, nuclear submarines, and IT systems — before becoming SecDef.
Erik Prince
Navy SEAL → CIA contractor
Founded Blackwater (now Academi)
Blackwater received $2B+ in contracts. Contractors involved in Nisour Square massacre (17 Iraqi civilians killed). Prince later proposed privatizing the entire Afghan war. Sister Betsy DeVos served as Trump's Education Secretary.
Cost-Plus Contracts: Rewarding Failure
The defense industry operates on a business model that would be considered insane in any other sector: cost-plus contracts. Under this arrangement, the government pays the contractor their costs plus a guaranteed profit margin. The more the program costs, the more the contractor earns.
This creates a perverse incentive: overruns are profitable. Delays are profitable. Complexity is profitable. The contractor has zero incentive to deliver on time or on budget — and they almost never do.
The Cost-Plus Hall of Shame
F-35 Joint Strike Fighter
+630%$233B
$1.7T (lifetime)
Lockheed Martin
Most expensive weapons program in human history. Still has 871 unresolved deficiencies.
Littoral Combat Ship
+127%$220M per ship
$500M+ per ship
Lockheed Martin / Austal
Navy retiring ships early because they don't work as intended. Billions wasted.
Gerald R. Ford Aircraft Carrier
+27%$10.5B
$13.3B
Huntington Ingalls
Most expensive warship ever built. Electromagnetic catapults still unreliable. Now deployed off Haifa for Iran strikes.
Zumwalt Destroyer
+531%$1.3B per ship (32 planned)
$8.2B per ship (3 built)
Bath Iron Works
Guns cancelled because ammunition cost $800K per round. Program reduced from 32 ships to 3.
KC-46 Tanker
+59%$4.9B (program)
$7.8B+
Boeing
Boeing absorbed $7B+ in losses but still operates. Too big to fail = too big to hold accountable.
The F-35 in 45 States: Political Engineering
The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter is not just a weapons program — it is a political masterpiece. Lockheed Martin has deliberately spread F-35 production across 45 states and 375 congressional districts. This is not efficient manufacturing. It is political engineering designed to make the program impossible to cancel.
When a program has suppliers in 90% of states, nearly every senator has a financial interest in its continuation. When it touches 375 out of 435 House districts, 86% of representatives face job losses if the program is cut. The F-35 doesn't need to work well — it just needs to employ people in the right places.
F-35 supplier states: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin. That's 45 out of 50 states — 90 out of 100 senators with a political interest in the most expensive weapons program in history.
The Contractor Body Count
One of the least-discussed aspects of America's post-9/11 wars is the role — and the deaths — of private military contractors. According to the Department of Labor and Brown University, more than 8,000 contractors died in Iraq and Afghanistan between 2001 and 2021.
In many years, contractor deaths exceeded military deaths. In 2009, more contractors were killed in Afghanistan than troops. In 2010, the ratio was similar. These deaths are not counted in official casualty figures. They don't get flags on coffins. Their families don't get the same benefits as military families. They are the invisible casualties of privatized war.
At the peak of the Iraq War, there were more private contractors in Iraq than US troops. In 2008, the Department of Defense had approximately 160,000 contractors in Iraq compared to 150,000 troops. Many were performing functions previously done by soldiers — security, logistics, intelligence, even interrogation. The outsourcing of war to private companies reduced political accountability (no draft, fewer “official” casualties) while massively increasing costs.
The Pentagon Has Never Passed an Audit
The Department of Defense is the only federal agency that has never passed a financial audit. In its most recent attempt (2023), the Pentagon failed for the sixth consecutive year. The department could not account for approximately $3.8 trillion in assets — roughly half of everything it owns.
To put this in perspective: a small business that couldn't pass an IRS audit would be shut down. A publicly traded company that couldn't produce auditable financials would be delisted. The Pentagon — which receives $886 billion per year of taxpayer money — simply shrugs and asks for more.
“War is a racket. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.”
The Bottom Line
When Operation Epic Fury launched on February 28, defense stocks surged. Raytheon — maker of the Tomahawk missiles raining down on Tehran — jumped 8% in a single day. Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and General Dynamics all hit all-time highs. The executives who run these companies will earn tens of millions this year.
The E-1 Private in the Persian Gulf earns $24,072. If they come home with PTSD — and 20% of combat veterans do — they'll spend years navigating a broken VA system. If they come home in a flag-draped coffin, their family gets a $100,000 death gratuity. The CEO of the company that made the missile that started the war earns that in less than two days.
War is a racket. Smedley Butler knew it in 1935. We know it now. The only question is whether we'll ever do anything about it.